Holotomial
Analysis

                                                                         Contact

Hands on
2D-mapping
Slides
Stacking
Eyes
Pairing
Spherical
Time-space
3D-Dynamic
Perspectives
Section 5    Foreword     *2D-Potential     *3D-Potential     Dynamics     Bifurcation    Time-Reset     Bit-Stock
 

5.3

 --- 3D-Potential

 

 

A Potential-Perspective is mostly a tool that convenes to keep in mind a global view of a specific situation and to support investigating scenarios.

 

To roadmap a particular travel or a user centric experience a Potential-Perpective may rapidly become cumbersome.

A convenient alternative to visualize a project in the time-space is to utilize the view point of a 3-D perspective that shows the time direction from the inside of the spherical space.

The figure shows the example of a central isometric perspective.

The past is located behind the centric user and the future up front to receive the expected balances sheets. The time-directions point radially from the outside frame corners to the future-cluster.

In illustration of a marketing project, the resources and the competitive environment are set sidewise, the targeted consumers are moving from the top to chose between us, our competitors or an alternative like devoting their budgets to other domains.

 

< previous page

related parallelisms

next page >

 
 
 
 


Parallelisms : Geometry - Neurophenomenology - Quantum Mechanics - Accounting


Geometry - Neurophenomenology

The P-map is usually an excellent support for communicating and creating global visual perceptions of a system.

When it comes at defining, controlling and executing a given program, usually you enter a time-line that indicates focal points.

The P-map - as a polar system - does not usually own this directional focus ability but the perspective does.

A perspective being constructed upon geometrical rational rules, it can be constructed to provide visually with the same information validity than any other rational alternative description of a system. 


Neurophenomenology

The isometric perspective view we introduced in the upper frame of this page came as a direct consequence of the several view points that we can have on a sphere and from the advantage we previously underlined that a view point from the inside of the sphere may exhibit in an easy manner the anticipatory character of a system - see page 4.6 .

Since the sphere is a geometrical object, other types of geometrical projections can of course be developed according to the interest of a desired view point.

In example, for a project that is merely independent of a competitive environment - i.e. the set up of a new production line - the right part of the above isometric projection - see the top of the page - is not actually necessary. One can so reduce its importance and displace the focal point towards the right side of the figure.

This in turn will correspond to the usual visual impression that the past-to-future direction is usually left-to-right on a graphical media.

When the focal is set et the infinite, we recover a graph that is similar to the standard project diagrams - i.e. Pert diagrams or Gantt charts.

We observed that the human brain handles those different projections in different manners, in particular that it may handle the volume of an isometric perspective like a perception of the time.

The interest of a 3-D environment for managing complex system has already been underlined independently of a spherical manifold - i.e. by the Pr. Patrick Georges - neurosurgeon and professor in management at the Solvay Business School - who inferred commercial applications of 3-D business data displays under the very explicit trade name of Management Cockpit.   

The fact that this experience has been induced by an expert in neuroscience suggests that it might be a relation between the spherical manifold - see page 4.5 - and the manner that we could model how the brain treats signals - in particular the visual ones.

The human brain being apparently a dynamical system, there is no a priori reason that one could not represent it within a manifold and a complete view - in the sense presented here - that eventually embed also its environment.

In this view very questioning is for us that our analogy with the double eyes - and their inverted view points - finds its origin in the 15th century - see page 3.1 , that it liaises with many parallelisms related to quantum mechanics and that we see now that it could be a suggestion at modeling "real eyes".


Neurophenomenology - Quantum Mechanics - Accounting

The fact that it could be correlations between quantum and neuro sciences is not so unexpected today.

The fact that correlations would be highlighted on an extension of the double-entry accounting system is highly more unexpected - at least it was not anticipated by us. A better apprehension of this modeling possibility will be gained at the next page.

This unexpected aspect is in fact nothing but the consequence of our choice to work exclusively within an observation space and from our decision to maintain the view complete.

On one hand, it inferred the obligatory usage of a double-entry accounting and on the other hand it inferred the necessity to maintain an non resolvable uncertainty in the view, which in turn creates the acquaintances with quantum mechanics.

As we built our system at describing current day life, it logically comes that quantum mechanics look within our views like natural occurrences handled in a natural way by human being - say by human brains.

It is also not so expected to encounter quantum like phenomena at macroscopic scales but its has been already described in several instances - i.e. by D. Aerts & Alii .