|
Parallelisms : Neurophenomenology - Statistics
Neurophenomenology
It is a fact that the
isometric perspective enables the brain to capture a time
impression and the pertinent environmental implications all at
once.
In this perspective, the human
brain can also perceive and pro-actively imagine motions and
causal loops even when they rely upon distributed groups and
locations.
Noticeable is the fact that
the double time-inversion - see
page 5.4 -
offers an
operational mechanism liaising "cause-effect" in a manner that can
be handled by both a human being brain and a computer - this last
one not needing any other fundamental modeling capacity than the
ability to calculate balances.
More than noticeable is that
no-one assumption has ever been made so far on the application
domain.
The parallelisms that have
been expressed with quantum mechanics with thermodynamics
concerned mainly spaces and collections - say that they referred
to operations on boxes but not to any specific content of those
boxes.
Hence, action programs or
users experiences design and control may be translated and
investigated with a similar (isometric) perspective in any domain
and the balance be always conversely described - i.e. in
quantitative domain like physics, engineering and accounting but
also in qualitative domain - say inferring human related issues -
like marketing, human resources management, coaching or
psychology.
Statistics
The uncertainty of the type
mentioned at the
page 4.7
cumulates when repeated over a prospective time period. They
typically nearly double at each new instance so that they rapidly
grow in an exponential manner within a graph representing
"uncertainty-versus-time".
Because they can be restricted
at a limited zone of the spherical manifold, noticeable is the
fact that they can be represented within a finite cluster zone - i.e. a
square - within the central [future] cluster of the isometric
perspective.
We may even infer a
representation that decreases eventually the importance of a risk
with time as the isometric projection decreases the size of an
object towards the focal point - i.e. like when the importance of
a risk modulated by a shortly due issue or long time delay before
it comes that we would care about it.
When several of those
uncertainties are present and interact with each others - as it is
often the case in the real life - their treatments via
"uncertainty-versus-time" relationships analysis become
cumbersome or infer intractable non linearity.
Noticeable is that in the case
of the isometric perspectives, they will only remain in the format
of finite cluster that can be treated like individualized and
bounded element.
Those finite zone of "infinite
uncertainty" does not decrease the degree of uncertainty. They
allow to highlight by adequate spots zones where "flip-flop" of
influence may raise and eventually where a human operator would
pay a particular attention and work at inferring an appropriate
context to favor the case in which he wishes the uncertainty to
reify.
Noticeable is that a detailed
time line within those spots is made of at least two converse
opposite cycles inferring infinite branching sequences. It does
not go without reclaiming at the origin of the discovery of the
fractals by
B.
Mandelbrot.
This in turn highlights that -
in addition to classically related phenomena - the isometric
perspective allows to indicate in a simple and natural manner
where complex risk or serependity may infer system evolutions.
|
