Holotomial
Analysis

                                                                         Contact

Hands on
2D-mapping
Slides
Stacking
Eyes
Pairing
Spherical
Time-space
3D-Dynamic
Perspectives
Section 1         Foreword        *Issues        *Mapping        Usages        Extensions        Archetypes
 

1.6

 ------ Archetypes

 

The practice extensions provided with several - more or less different or acquainted - types of maps.

 

They were all indicating how people, objects or information were likely moving in different fields.

It came surprisingly that the best making sense schemas arranged in a manner that we would have classify  living cells and organisms.

The most simples landed downside as  common parents, the more complex distributed upwards branching with specializing with contexts.

The most premier was a one-item-cluster map that could obviously generate all the rest. The first next surviving species was having on average a base of eight squared cells ... like six would be becoming not enough and ten becoming too much.

We looked at how the two primary types may enable to capture the origin of the magic and to generate the others.

 

< previous page

related parallelisms

 next section >

 
 
 
 


Parallelism
s
: Organic cells - Life sciences - Evolution


Organic cells - Life sciences - Evolution

We looked actually at many design types hoping that archetypes of some sort would come from practices.

One can say first that it was drawing and so we could have any type of drawing - i.e. like with a language we can conversely have any type of texts.

A one particular type retained our attention: it was the one where each external sector was having some sort of acquaintance with his direct neighbors such that an some collections - i.e. of information - provided to one sector had a chance to be transferred to the two adjacent neighbors, translated by those ones to be further transferred also at their own neighbors and so on, so that finally the initial information set would come back in a other format at it initial pace and restart a new alike cycle.

It looked exactly like those particular schemas were able to create and maintain sustainable motions like in a set of living cells or in a brain. For this reason we called them "organic maps" or "organic spaces".

In the light of this view, we reworked schemas exhibiting economy or market descriptions having disconnected segments. We opened up sectors in between those non connected segments and we generally discovered that either our description had missed existing sectors either that the market or the economy were not quite healthy as a whole.

We observed that those type of schema may adapt their complexity with regards with contexts but also that they may generally remain relatively simple - i.e. in the sense that one person could have one schema at work, one with the family, one with the friends, and so on, the schemas being not existing at the same time but exhibited in response to external context variations.

It followed also that we managed to complete some schemas that were fragmented and that we segregated others that were containing pieces of unrelated-like families - say like when you have fossil fragments and that you can rebuild a whole description because the filiations evolution is known (note: the author has closed his engineering college degree by a qualification work in stratigraphy at the department of paleontology of UCL - Belgium).

It came so that the initial diversity became more like a whole where some species were more frequent and had more ubiquity than others. From there, we stacked on two basic ones to look at finding  roots that infer this unexpected "biotopology".