|
Parallelisms : Semantic - Holotomography - Neurophenomenology
Semantic
To set the frame of this
paragraph, let's mention that since the emergence of the web, I
have been involved in several work issues related with semantic. I
looked at web writing - at the aim of users experience ergonomics
and to be found from different types of search engines as well as
I identified semantic sets structures aiming at the construction
and testing of a three search engines - each dedicated at a
specific case with regards to document management and information
retrieval - i.e. I looked at vectors based models, nouns
frequencies in text and query sets and at metadata generation and
efficiency.
When we recognized a
parallelisms between our maps and quantum mechanics - see the
Hilbert spaces test in the parallelism of the
page 1.3 -
I made a tour back in semantic and I easily found authors
recognizing quantum like structure in semantic - see
D. Aerts & alii.
Since I always cared about
possible acquaintance between our maps and the semantic domain.
Two persons suggested that our
maps were related to a kind of language - one highlighted that it
was a visual piece of language and an other one suggested that
they could be handled as a writing means.
When we decided about our best
set of configuration conventions - see the
page 2.4
- we observed that a written text was in line with them - say that
a text was also and "per se" a complete view.
When we looked at our design
extensions within other domains, we designed a set of working
assumptions on how the structures exhibited by our maps could be
liaised with semantic. They can be shortly summarized by the
following three points:
1. The coordinates [q] that
provide the configuration of a time frame are best to be nouns of
objects-actors that are individualized and separable.
In general nouns relating to
persons are the most sense making for framing dynamics - say i.e.
people, group of people, organization names, brands or sectors as
well as locations or buildings names providing that they symbolize
people.
Nouns that relates to
intangible concepts are also sense making when they may designate
like groups of people at work - i.e. packaging, marketing,
logistics - and nouns that relate to objects are better seen as
moving bodies in a time frame - i.e.
goods in a market.
The nouns that are utilized to
describe information, knowledge, idea and conceptualization are
also like moving objects in the frame.
In any case, most of the frames
are having sense mostly from the nouns.
Alternatively, we may say "and
from nouns groups" in the sense that adjective have no meaning by
themselves but only when they are associated with a noun and shape with him a
unique entity - say that an adjective would be senseless per se, in
the sense that it can be associated nearly with any nouns, so it
is only owning a sense when actually associated with a given noun.
2. The actions [p] are
represented by verbs; verbs usages is to liaise two nouns; verb
may in principle liaise with any nouns. Because they may also
liaise with so much entities, they also own per se a very weak
sense if not none at all in general.
Adverbs have no more sense
than adjective and they only liaise with verb at creating entities,
like adjectives do for the nouns - say a noun + an adjective is
like another noun, a verb with an adverb is like another verb.
3. The time periods [t] are
"all the rest" that is in between nouns and verbs: the more frequent
one is the white spaces but also the dots, the pronouns, the
conjunctions, the articles. They meaning is nil.
Because of a lack of time and
resources, we have not gone further on to verify if those working
assumptions would raise advantages in the semantic domains but
when we defined a time frame as above in this page, we found that
they were a very nice illustration about it, in particular about
the property that actions were non localized potentials, that they
reify only the presence of two given coordinates and that
time-period is a liaison mean in between.
Semantic - Holotomography -
Neurophenomenology
The construction of the
section 5 suggested - in an unknown manner - liaisons between our
maps and how the human brain makes connections that are implicit
between a human understanding and visual elements.
As said, this makes us to
again pay
attention that a plain text is fully respecting the convention
that we selected as our best options for the configuration of an
organic space - refer to the
page 2.4
.
In turn, a plain text is a
complete view in the same way that our maps are so that some brain
understanding mechanism might be recognized similar in a text and
in our maps.
This inferred the observation
that - when we refer to a text and we pay attention to white space
spaces that we indicated in the previous paragraph as possibly
representing time periods in a text - we can easily observe in a
text that several white space values are inducing several
associated different human brain behaviors.
In example, the spaces between
the letters of a word are small and such that the human brain
nearly takes a word in "one shot" - even when some letters are
permuted. The spaces between words are larger - say above the
double - and the brain takes easily a few words but not so much
like a paragraph is rarely taken at once.
White spaces between
paragraphs and pages are still larger and the brain take obviously
more time to assemble them - i.e. with usually a noticeable break in between.
We tested a few examples with
both a narrow and a slightly doubled space between elements and
group of elements in the map - say like the spaces between the
letters of word and between different words. An example of such
trial may be seen at the last map at the bottom of this
examples
page.
Noticeable is that the element
separated by the small spaces have been taken by the watchers as whole unique and identified entities -
say like a "word" however
they could not
name it - and that the
relationships between all those implicitly described entities have
been reported very alike relationship between
words in a sentence.
In a sense, the value of the
white space on a map - like in a text - seems to suggest like the
importance of a relationship and seems to reflect an ability of
the human brain to integrate them either at once either in more or
less short or long time interval.
|
